please re-read brief and look critically at your work with the general shortcomings in mind
From brief:
You have illustrate the greater narrative and your position towards public space in
- a photographic documentary of public spaces you have visited and 2 book case studies in form of a story board and analytical diagrams
- a comic style storyboard on how the bench is used in various ways and addressing issues raised in your analysis
- a short essay/ manifesto about the necessity of accessible public space (+-1500 words) referring to 3 texts handed out
- larger public space map of Rosettenville (projected)
- Format: A5 portrait = folded A4 landscape, template to be provided
Evaluation:
Documentary / Case Study 25%
Essay/ Manifesto 25%
Storyboard Bench 25%
Presentation 25%
General shortcomings:
Essay/ manifesto
spelling and grammar mistakes
very general statements, often not based on an argument (as in ‘expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence’ http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/argument/) and/ or misinformed
no reference to readings and specific public spaces
no paragraphs (layout/ content)
unsuitable language
use of stereotypes as opposed to specific contextual knowledge
Documentary/ 2 case studies/ analysis
not enough photos or no photos that capture the situation
vague or no captions
weak or little (or no) analysis
no or little references and sources
Comic/ storyboard
no storyboard
storyboard too short
no relevant story
bad illustrations
fuzzy or distorted illustrations
Presentation
no index
no page numbers
fuzzy photographs or drawings
confusing, inconsistent structure
poor and/ or inconsistent aesthetics
incomplete
No comments:
Post a Comment